Centre will not act on Madras HC’s remarks on NEET
Pritha Roy Choudhury | March 13, 2020 | 04:47 PM IST | 2 mins read
NEW DELHI: The Ministry of Health and Family Welfare is not planning to take action on the Madras High Court’s remark that the National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (NEET) favours the urban and wealthy candidates who can afford coaching.
In the ministry’s view, “the matter has already been settled” by the Supreme Court and the Parliament, it told Lok Sabha in response to a question on March 13.
NEET Impersonation
The NEET was made the single exam for admission into all medical colleges across the country on the order of the Supreme Court. It covered all states first in 2017. Two years later, in 2019, widespread corruption and impersonation were discovered in the examination and counselling process in some states. The cases reached the Madras High Court which, on the basis of data shared by the state of Tamil Nadu, had made two broad observations in November 2019.
According to the government’s own reply, the Madras HC had noted that “the number of candidates who appeared multiple times got admission more than who appeared the first time and also only negligible candidates got admission without undergoing coaching”.
However, the Madras HC’s observations were on equity and access. The Firstpost reported that the court said: “That means medical education is not available to the poor people and it is available only to those who underwent coaching classes by spending lakhs of rupees. Moreover, this will also put rural students in a disadvantageous position, as they lack facilities of undergoing coaching." These are the comments referred to in the Parliament question.
The Response
However, the Central Government does not intend to address the issues raised by the Madras High Court. The Ministry of Health and Family Welfare has referred to a number of laws and Supreme Court judgments to explain why, in its view, no action is required to improve access to rural students.
Tamil Nadu had attempted to block the implementation of NEET in the state by passing two Bills to that effect in the state legislatures but was ultimately thwarted by the Centre. As the response says: “The provisions of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 for conducting NEET shall apply across the country without any exemption.”
The reply also reminds that the National Medical Commission Act 2019 now provides for NEET – Tamil Nadu had objected to that as well – and that the exam was originally made mandatory by the Supreme Court. In 2016, the SC had ruled that “only NEET would enable students to get admission to MBBS or BDS studies”.
Also read :
-
NEET Scam: Experts suggest better use of technology, further centralization of exam’s management
-
AIIMS and JIPMER to admit students based on NEET scores from 2020
Write to us at news@careers360.com
Follow us for the latest education news on colleges and universities, admission, courses, exams, research, education policies, study abroad and more..
To get in touch, write to us at news@careers360.com.
Featured News
]- Experts propose 7 spots for university townships in education ministry’s post-budget webinar
- Primary school teachers in Karnataka must serve 12 years before promotion, say new recruitment rules
- JNU, TISS Mumbai, BHU: Student unions vanish from universities with elections scrapped, councils taking over
- Students in University of Aberdeen, Mumbai, get credential exactly the same they’d get in Scotland: COO
- ‘IIMC to upgrade all journalism and mass communication courses to MA degrees, phase out PG diplomas’: VC
- Rebuilding Calcutta University: VC Ashutosh Ghosh’s priorities are recruitment, fixing finances, reforms
- PARAKH’s Foundational Learning Study 2026 to cover 1 lakh Class 3 students across 10,000 schools
- Telangana: Government Degree College Vikarabad moves out of school and into DIET campus
- ‘Shouldn’t open universities like shops’: Odisha higher education expands but students rue plummeting quality
- Dual degrees, faculty exchange: States bet on foreign university tie-ups, but fine print tells another story